TIME TO... WRITE.
— The humans are very imperfect, so his creations too, therefore if there is any mistake in their operation, must "to die" as a precaution measure.
Other arguments have deserved your votes too:
— Everything that begins has to end and the robots must be retired.
— If robots don't fulfill the Three Laws they can do a lot of damage.
— If robots really have feelings, they can have also be tired of working. If they have been working for lots of years, they can be retired.
— If the robots live eternally, they would replace to humanity.
— Robots can be very problematics if they can decide what to do every moment.
— The can had a revolution and be the next lords of the world and submite humans.
Your new task is the following: to write an essay using the most voted argument and three of the other listed here. Of course the reasoning (your use of the arguments) must be coherent with your opinion.
Very important! You ‘may’ have noticed that there are plenty of grammar mistakes in the expression of those arguments. Be careful not to transfer them to your essays.
posted by ConstanTeacher at 9:53 pm
15 Comments:
Personally, I'm in favour of retire and limite robots' life for different reasons.
First of all, if humans are imperfect , robots also are imperfect and they can make a lot of mistakes. Consequently to this imperfection, it can make a lot of problems.
Firstly, if robots don't fulfill the Three Laws they can do a lot of damage to the humanity. Secondly, robots can be very problematics if they can decide what to do every moment. For this reason, when we least expect it, robots wil be able to do something. In addition, if robots have been created to our similarity, they must be retired because everything that begins has to end.
For the previous reasons, if robots aren't well created or they have any kind of problem, they must be retired!
In my opinion, robots should have limited lives for various reasons.
First, I think that humankind is very imperfect, so their creations too, therefore if there is any mistake in their operation, they must self-destruct as a precaution measure. For example, if someone made a robot, this could have some mistakes in your operation system, and it would make a lot of damage to the world society.
Then, if robots live eternally, they would replace humanity in many ways, because people have a limited life, and life in human terms has an end, which would leave the question: Which is the meaning of life for robots? For this reason everything that begins has to end and robots must be retired from world.
Furthermore, if robots really have feelings, they may be tired of working for so many years, so they would be retired. For example robots, which have a purpose, have expired with his aim of creation, they can be updated or eliminated.
As a summary, science should, before discussing about the topic: "should robots be retired?", think how, and why, they want to create the machines in the future.
In my opinion I think that robots mustn’t live eternally for three simple reasons.
First of all, I agree whit the person to say that robots was created by humans and, same humans be imperfect they too will be, and I think that for could finish with this problem, the best is that they have a limited live.
Other reason for that I think this is that if they could live ever, finally would not be humans beings, and whit this form we can end whit they easily.
Finally I only have to say that the best to have robots is that never will stop to be a machine that if do some bad think, because they decide what do in every moment, or this will broke you ever can do, or buy other and not have a problem.
For this reasons I think that is good that they have a limited live.
First of all I would like to remark that a robot is a machine, and all the machines have his lifetime. It’s like everything in this world, if there is a begin, there should be an end.
Secondly, the retirement of a robot is fair because if his creator, the human, detected an imperfection, he have to proceed to the retirement of his creation. Furthermore, the human is not perfect, so his creations might be imperfect too.
In addition, I think that if a robot can make damage to human, they shouldn’t be created. The robots should obey at least one of the Asimov laws, which says that an robot mustn’t hurt the human been.
Finally, if the robots could live eternally, there is possibility that they will replace the humans. As I saw in the film “Blade Runner”, is very difficult to distinguish between a robot and a human, so as a consequence of this confusion, the replace of the human been could begin.
Julian said:
I'm in favor of that if a machine is created for one reason when that reason ends the robots can be retired or destroyed, what humans decide to do with it.
Firstly I think that if robots don't have inside the three laws they can decide for itselfs and consequently maybe do things versus humans like make do us the things that time ago they did it.
Also, how I said before, they can do bad things to humans, because if it have feelings they can do whatever it likes, and it’s possible that this things sometimes would be for attack the people, I'm not saying ever, but it’s possible that sometimes.
what's more, if they can decide, how they are stronger than us they’d can take advantage of it and submit us forever, consequently being the next lords of the world and use us for serve it for the rest of the years for the humanity.
I think that robots should be retired for differents reasons.
First of all, If humans are imperfect his creations are too. In world imperfect things aren't necessary and they can be dangerous for humanity and world.For this reason they should be retired.
Another reason, is that robots can do everything that they want because don't have Assimov's Three Laws. And they can kill people and this is a very big problem. Is another enemy for the world.
Furthermore, If robots have feelings they can be tired of working. For this reason they can be retired. Because if they are tired of working a lot, they can rebel to humanity.
Finally, I think that all this can be summarizing in only one thing: everything that begins has to be an end. In this world anything remains eternally. And this robots are only machines and when the time pass this machines will be getting damaged, and finally they desapear.
In my opinion, I'm in favour of to put a limited life for the robots.
Firstly, like the humans are very imperfect, his creations are too, therefore if there is a mistake in their operation, the human would have to destroy that robot as a precaution measure.
Secondly, I think that everything that begins have to end and the robots must to be retired. Like the humans, the robots must to 'born' and to 'die'. What's more, it's true that if the robots live eternally, they would replace the humanity.
Furthermore, if robots are defective, they would be able to decide what to do every moment, so the will be free and this is dangerous.
Finally, if the robots are bad programmed or they have a problem they have to be retired, because if they were in operation, they were dangerous for humans.
Robots need to be retired, due to the following reasons:
A human being is not perfect, but we can create perfect machines, but sometimes the machines have errors. Those errors can make robots to not to work properly, and, they could attack us, so, if a robot doesn't work well, it will need to be "retired".
What happens if they decide to make a revolution, and, for example, they decide to show us their power? Would we become their slaves? That's why when a robot tries to show its power, better force it to be retired, before it is too late
A robot is a machine, not a life thing, it won't die unless it is broken, so, they can keep alife for thousands of years, and, at the end, they may finish replacing humanity, and, everything has to start, and finish. Nothing is eternal, so, a robot must "die" too, by biological law. If not, maybe in the year 3000, we will have a world filled of robots and just a couple of humans.
In conclusion, robots need to be retired, as humans, to avoid future problems that can happen
In my opinion, robots should be eliminated of our society for several reasons:
One of these reasons is that the humans created new robots and these robots can be imperfect, because no humane is perfect since all of them make mistakes.
Consequently, these mistakes can be bad for everybody.
For that reason, in the future robots would be able to make what they wanted and harm humans or robots because they don't have any feelings.
In conclusion, I think that robots have to be eliminated not to cause any more problems to the society.
Regarding this topic, I think that robots have to be limited and retired for several reasons.
First of all, I believe that humans are very imperfect, so their creations are imperfect too, therefore if there are some mistakes in their operations, they must die as a precaution measure. And if human are imperfect, consequently, their creations are imperfect too.
Then, robots can be very problematic if they can decide what to do ever. Secondly, if robots live eternally, they would replace humanity. Then if robots don't fulfill the three laws can do a lot of harm.
for these reasons, my opinion is that we should destroy all robots, and we should do all the things without any help.
I agree that humans are very imperfect and that some of their creations are also. In my view, a robot can be perfectly perfect or have perfectly errors.
First the perfect robots can really help humanity. For example, they help at the time of construction, or do heavy work. And they can live easily with humans if they are not evil influenced.
Secondly, not perfect robots can cause many problems. For example, they may fail when executed an order, and risk that they not fulfil the three laws could do a lot of damage.
To sum up, I would say that the creation of perfect robot can help a lot, but always can be created with bugs. Hopefully the humans learn to make the right robots to create a better society
Vane said:
In my opinion robots doesn’t live eternally, because it‘s dangerous.
First because the robots are dangerous for humans, they’re stronger than humans and they can kill them. If robots kill humans the world has been finished. This robots doesn’t live with the three laws. For this reasons they can retired.
The robots are created for a doing a specific task, and when this task has do it he are realized his function, and they are retired. Is the best for the people because for other task he created other robot.
And the most important is they don’t respect the life of humans and for this reasons are very dangerous because it’s kill people because are very strength and doesn’t have feelings to think this action are very cruel.
Finally, I think the robots can retire for save the live of humans and the planet, because the robot is a machine and the machines not live eternity.
In my opinion robots need to have a limited life for a lot of reasons.
First,the humans are very imperfect, so his creations too, therefore if there is any mistake in their operation, must'to die'as a precaution measure.It's very dangerous live with something that can damage you.
Then,If the robots live eternally, they would replace to humanity.If robots continue increasing and don't die, they will be a lot and they are going to steal our place at the world.
Furthermore,they can do a revolution and be the next lords of the world and submite humans.It's probably that they control ours lifes and will be the kings of the world and the humanity.
For these reasons I think that the best solution for all is that thay have a limited life.
MARINA M :
I disagree with the most vote’s argument for the following reasons.
First of all, if the humans are very imperfect their creation will be, so robots will be imperfect and they couldn’t repair their wrong actions like humans do. For this reason I think that robots should have a limited life.
Furthermore, if robots really had feelings, they would be tired of working, so there wouldn’t been difference between humans and robots, then why do we need them?
There fore, we can not forget than robots have a machine, so they would be very problematic if they could decide what to do every moment. They would be more powerful than us.
Finally, if robots lived eternally, they would replace us and the world’s evolution could a disaster.
In my opinion, I agree that the life of the robots has to be limited for these reasons:
If the robots are imperfect, they can give a lot of problems to the persons, and there would be a lot of consequences
If they don't have a limited life, they would live eternally and would be many, at the time they would finish with the humanity and would replace it.
If we do not limit the life of the robots, they can join, put in opposition to the persons and to be a danger for the humanity.
Post a Comment
<< Home